We have been bombarded about the threat of nuclear weapons.
At the same time we have been barraged by the claim that nuclear power is essential for our energy needs.
And over and over we have been battered by the assertion that plutonium is the most dangerous element in the world and just coming in contact with it will kill you.
Plutonium is extracted from uranium which is mined in the earth.
By adding neutrons into the nucleus of uranium atoms, plutonium is formed.
Since it decays by emitting alpha particles from it’s nucleus, plutonium is classified as an unstable isotope and the energy emitted from it is called nuclear radiation.
Is this radiation harmful?
When atomic particles leave the nucleus, the atom becomes ionized and these charged particles make up an electric current only if they are moving in an magnetic field.
Nuclear radioactivity does not constitute an electric current and the radiation is not harmful such as the moving ionized charged particles in microwave and x-ray emissions.
The energy escaping from the nuclear radiation is actually minute.
And we are told uranium and plutonium are so powerful that their half life decay rate will last hundreds of millions or even billions of years.
We are also told by harnessing this radiated energy we can derive power from it.
The first nuclear power plants were constructed to develop bombs using plutonium.
The idea was that energy created by the release of atomic particles would form a chain reaction and cause a massively potent explosion creating bombs more powerful than anyone could imagine.
But this did not happen.
The same idea was extended to the sun.
It is taught that the sun is powered by the magic nuclear transformation or decay of hydrogen into helium deep inside it’s interior.
This convective process has never been shown to occur.
In fact as seen in sunspots the sun is cooler in the inside, while out in the corona it is much hotter meaning the sun is powered externally.
The sun is an orb of plasma storing charged particles and releasing them in an electrical drift current.
It is not a nuclear bomb. There is no such thing!
Nikola Tesla showed electric power is everywhere available in unlimited quantities from the natural electromagnetic field of the Earth and that we have no need of fuel or anything else for energy.
But free power is anathema to the Control Grid.
Power companies use the Tesla Coil of alternating currents for power at little cost to them but charge consumers an exorbitant rate.
The first nuclear power plant was built in 1951 near Arco Idaho as an experiment.
In 1957 the first operating plant was built in Shippingport Pennsylvania.
There are now 64 so called nuclear power plants in the USA alone and a total of 104 reactors.
Most were built in the late 1970’s and early 1980’s and were said to last around 40 years.
Why 40 years?
40 years has now arrived.
These facilities were built along rivers, lakes and oceans because water is needed to be converted into steam.
The steam it is said is needed to drive turbines and to cool the reactor cores.
But the real purpose of the steam is for weather modification purposes.
Very few uranium enhancement facilities are still around.
There is only .7% uranium in uranium 235 and when it is enhanced to 4% it is called enriched uranium.
The uranium used for its atoms is called depleted uranium and is only .3% uranium 235.
Since we now have laser technology making bombs is obsolete.
Especially ones that never worked.
But there is all this depleted uranium just sitting around.
So the military came up with the bright idea of dropping it on Afghanistan and Iraq.
Then somebody thought of selling it as a weed killer.
It became Monsanto’s Roundup.
Brainwashed people spray it all over their yard.
Plutonium does not have much use now but is used experimentally in things like medical radiation therapy.
When plutonium is heated and melted and put in a metal tube it will become a glowing battery which would last for some say a hundred years.
It will not be on the market any time soon but would be very useful in a doomsday scenario.
In the late 90’s they started spraying heavy metals in the atmosphere.
These metals which includes uranium were sprayed first from airplanes and now from drones in the form of chemtrails.
This was to ionize the atmosphere in order to control the weather.
This spraying ruined our natural weather and now water vapor has to be sprayed into the air to produce rain.
So now we have surface air coolers or steam plants producing water vapor masquerading as nuclear power plants spread all around the country.
The nuclear power plant lie has been promulgated to keep the real agenda a secret.
Which is controlling the people by controlling the weather.
Soon communities will have to purchase rain.
To shift the focus, this weather transformation or climate change is falsely being blamed on the public as a result of automobile emissions.
Back n the 1940’s it was said Russia had developed a nuclear bomb and we needed to build bigger and better nuclear bombs then what they have.
Also in the 1940’s we were told that particles in a nuclear bomb travel over a mile per second and that anyone in the vicinity will become blind, have their reproductive organs damaged beyond repair and in all probability would instantly die.
Bikini Atoll is one of the Marshall Islands in the East Indies in the South Pacific.
23 offshore nuclear tests are said to have been done there.
The natives had to be kicked out.
These blasts are supposed to create not only tremendous wind but also 100,000 degree Fahrenheit heat and since the explosion was under the water it would also create a tsunami.
But looking at before and after pictures of Bikini Atoll the grass roofed huts, palm trees and swimming docks remain untouched.
As a matter of fact this inconceivable amount of heat would have at the very least turned the whole island into magma.
It only has to be 1300 Fahrenheit to produce lava.
In reality everything at those extreme temperatures would be vaporized!
You see how ridiculously silly this is?
The islanders eventually came back but were kicked again because it was said that strontium was found in crabs.
But why does the military maintain a presence there?
Why do they grow crops there if it is all contaminated by nuclear explosions?
Why are diving tours being conducted there?
Why in the ‘pictures’ of these tests, the boats out on the water near the blast remain unscathed?
Is it because the pictures were faked?
Why is not only the island thriving but the coral reef there is a diverse and well populated underwater habitat.
The Trinity test in New Mexico was supposed to be even bigger.
Why didn’t this blast create a crater?
Why did Robert Oppenheimer and his Generals pose for a picture a few weeks afterwards at ground zero?
That area should have been highly radioactive according to nuclear science.
The onlookers who were allowed to watch said they felt the heat from the blast.
But that means they would have got hit by the radiation.
Why were they not concerned and why did they not suffer any ill effects?
Maybe because it was all faked!
The Bravo bomb test in Nevada was said to be the biggest of all.
Why were so many soldiers allowed to watch?
Why did they not have protective clothing or goggles or anything?
Their eyes should have been fried and their testicles rendered inoperative!
They should have gotten cancer.
The blast cloud is supposed to have reached 60 miles into the air and traveled dozens of miles on the land surface.
Some soldiers are even pictured without a shirt.
The answer is that it was a detonation of dynamite and not any so-called atomic bomb and the soldiers knew that and were not concerned.
It was all a publicity stunt!
If nuclear bombs are real why all the fakery?
Why has Nagasaki and Hiroshima gotten no increase in cancer rates?
Both are thriving tourist towns with no ill effects at all.
The bombs dropped there and also in Tokyo and other cities in 1945 were incendiary fire bombs.
They were dropped nine months after the Japanese emperor wanted peace.
Instead he got nine more months of fire bombing.
Nuclear bombs are supposed to incinerate everything within miles so why were all the buildings in Hiroshima still standing with no structural damage afterwards?
Why has Chernobyl in Russia remained a haven for wildlife?
Why has Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania remained open if it was supposed to leak radioactive elements and cause cancer?
We were assured that the radiation fallout from Fukushima in Japan would contaminate the Pacific Ocean and reach the west coast of the U.S. giving coastal residents cancer and other health problems.
It never happened!
And why were there no blackouts in Japan after Fukushima when only one power plant remained open?
Nuclear power is supposed to account for one third of their energy.
We are told that nuclear power plants like the one at San Onofre in Southern California leaks, but beach goers have went to the beaches right beside it all these years and no one has suffered any ill effects.
Indian Point in upstate New York is supposed to be leaking radioactive material into the drinking water of New York City.
Why hasn’t anyone died form this?
Diablo Canyon and Oyster Creek are among many others which are said to continually leak.
Maybe they are all steam plants!
Yucca Mountain in Nevada is supposedly a huge nuclear waste storage facility but it is instead just a big underground military base.
Hanford in Washington state gets hundreds of millions to clean up the site.
It is all a big scam.
In fact the nuclear reactor scam is second only to the fake NASA moon landing scam.
Both have received upwards near 100 billion dollars.
Both have said they lost or erased technological achievements.
In the 1980’s a physicist named Galen Windsor who worked at different nuclear facilities ridiculed the prevailing opinion by actually consuming plutonium.
He stated nuclear fission is a hoax and that radioactivity is not harmful.
A swat team raided his home and took all his uranium.
He lived into his 80’s with no repercussions from ingesting the plutonium.
Workers at Los Alamos regularly have plutonium in their body.
Some have had it for over 50 years.
Why haven’t they died?
When some manufactured hurricane, earthquake or tsunami hits a power plant a meltdown will be said to have occurred.
This meltdown will be blamed on the explosion of hydrogen gas in the reactors.
This excuse will be used to drive people from their homes and relocate them into Fema Camps.
Nuclear reactors do not exist!
Nuclear radiation does not exist!
Nuclear power does not exist!
There are no nuclear weapons!
And there are no atomic bombs!
The Big Nuclear Power Scam, the Fakery of Nuclear Bombs and the Meltdown Hoax
We have been bombarded about the threat of nuclear weapons.
Very interesting. That the atomic bomb is a hoax, I’ve known it for years. But I still can’t get my brain around a nuclear power plant hoax. If it’s not uranium, what is the energy source. Tesla coil? I’m lost….
Most so-called nuclear power plants are in fact cloud producing plants to counter the effects of chemtrails. The ones that use uranium convert it to caesium which is being kept from the public.
If nuclear power doesn’t exist, what powers nuclear submarines?
When you say all the buildings in Hiroshima, i hope you dont mean that literally. It does look like it was all burnt to me though.
They have battery packs that are fully charged and are rechargeable to power the engine. Doesn’t make sense to carry around radioactive isotopes just to heat water to produce steam to run the engine. The nuclear weapons are actually laser weaponry. Directed energy weapons are always being covered up.
they have some alien element that emits non stop energy. if they gave us free energy they couldn’t control us anymore.
With all the fakery that’s been uncovered, I think it’s only fair we question the validity of the Tesla story.
For all we know he could have been an actor if he ever truly existed at all.
Our history is a lie and I suggest that most of the tech Tesla’s given credit for probably already existed. It’s technology developed by a civilization that existed in our recent past but was wiped out by a worldwide cataclysm that’s been hidden from us.
Many of the magnificent old Greco -Romano stone masonry buildings that exist in cities throughout all of North America were already here when we first arrived. And so was the technology.
They needed a story to help explain how all this new tech came to be. Hence, the Tesla character. Perhaps he did exist and was responsible for reverse engeneering the tech, I dont know. All I do know is that the mainstream narrative aboutanything is most often a lie.
I needed to post you a little bit of note to finally say thanks once again considering the precious ideas you have shown at this time. It was really wonderfully open-handed of people like you to convey unreservedly precisely what a number of people might have offered as an ebook to get some bucks for themselves, certainly seeing that you might well have done it in case you decided. These ideas additionally worked to provide a great way to be certain that someone else have the same desire similar to mine to learn more and more regarding this problem. I am certain there are a lot more pleasant times in the future for individuals that looked over your site.
Thank you Makeda!
I have a sneaky suspicion that nuclear plants use power from the grid to produce steam, to run the turbine in order to store energy “nuclear batteries”. They then sell this energy back onto the grid when needed in high power demands. It’s a racket, because I suspect the price of selling is much higher than their total cost of operation (including purchase).
I also think a large portion of the electricity contained in the grid does not come from the coal or hydro plants. A large portion comes from the conversion of atmospheric energy by the power lines (i.e. metal in the air conducts as shown by Tesla). If you manage to put copper high in the atmosphere, and ground it at the same time, you get a small electrical current. Imagine the amount of metal in the air of a power grid the size of the US? I also think they suck back some of the energy we buy from them through the ground (hence the ground return (metal rod) each home has stuck in the soil. The ground around each home is electromagnetised…
Of course I have no proof that the nuclear plants are racket. They tell that plants need electricity to run the pumps, and so on, but they never tell us how much they need… That’s a bit odd; you would think they would use their own electrical product to power their pumps? There are more and more papers that talk about “nuclear batteries” (i.e. storing energy from the nuclear plant), but it comes across as novelties. I’m not so sure about that, since they have hidden much of the Tesla technology and others for decades…
hey buddi, do yu have a n email? i agree with what yu say and would like to discuss more.
Solved the grayness issue with a “reader view” extension for Chrome!
Thank you, excellent article, I’ll use the clues here to search further since you did not insert references.
A plausible concept is that they are creating Caesium from the uranium which gives off electrons when light is directed on it. This would be a powerful and easily managed energy source.
The State’s ability to deceive the public relies upon one fact more than any other; namely this, the science of logic hasn’t been taught in State controlled public schools in living memory. John Gatto argues in his book “The Underground History of American Education ” that the state began to dumb down our schools over a century ago, when they first seized control of our children’s education. True teaching of logic/rhetoric/dialectic had to go you see, so that they could more effectively lie to us about everything else . Logical arguments just be well supported by reliable evidence. That’s a law of logic that must people don’t understand . There is no reliable evidence that nuclear weapons exist . Just like there is no reliable evidence that Arab terrorists carried out the murders of September 11, 2001, or that man ever walked on the Moon .
Here’s some info about the science of logic that the reader may find helpful.
“Logic, therefore, as the science of thought, or the science of the process of pure reason, should be capable of being constructed a priori.”
-Arthur Schopenhauer, The Art of Controversy
(“A priori” is defined as deduced from self-evident premises.) ••••••••••
‘Logic: The science that investigates the principles governing correct or reliable inference.’
-Webster’s Unabridged Encyclopedic Dictionary ••••••••••
‘infer … v. ,1. To derive by reasoning; conclude or judge from premises or evidence …’
-Webster’s Unabridged Encyclopedic Dictionary ••••••••••
‘For logic is the science of those principles, laws, and methods which the mind of man in its thinking must follow for the accurate and secure attainment of truth.” -Celestine N. Bittle, “The Science of Correct Thinking: Logic” ••••••••••
“We suppose ourselves to posses unqualified scientific knowledge of a thing, as opposed to knowing it in the accidental way in which the sophist knows, when we think that we know the cause on which the fact depends, as the cause of that fact and of no other, and further, that the fact could not be other than it is”.
-Aristotle, Posterior Analytics ••••••••••
“We ought in fairness to fight our case with no help beyond the bare facts: nothing, therefore, should matter except the proof of those facts.”
-Aristotle, Rhetoric ••••••••••
“Without the presentation of solid evidence no argument can be a good one”
-Patrick Hurley, A Concise Introduction to Logic, 1985 ••••••••••
‘Fallacious reasoning is just the opposite of what can be called cogent reasoning. We reason cogently when we reason (1) validly; (2) from premises well supported by evidence; and (3) using all relevant evidence we know of. The purpose of avoiding fallacious reasoning is, of course, to increase our chances of reasoning cogently.’
-Howard Kahane, Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric, 1976, second edition ••••••••••
‘The province of Logic must be restricted to that portion of our knowledge which consists of inferences from truths previously known; whether those antecedent data be general propositions, or particular observations and perceptions. Logic is not the science of Belief, but the science of Proof, or Evidence. In so far as belief professes to be founded on proof, the office of Logic is to supply a test for ascertaining whether or not the belief is well grounded.’
-John Stuart Mill, A System of Logic ••••••••••
‘The fallacy of suppressed evidence is committed when an arguer ignores evidence that would tend to undermine the premises of an otherwise good argument, causing it to be unsound or uncogent. Suppressed evidence is a fallacy of presumption and is closely related to begging the question. As such, it’s occurrence does not affect the relationship between premises and conclusion but rather the alleged truth of premises. The fallacy consists in passing off what are at best half-truths as if they were whole truths, thus making what is actually a defective argument appear to be good. The fallacy is especially common among arguers who have a vested interest in the situation to which the argument pertains.’
-Patrick Hurley, A Concise Introduction to Logic, 1985 ••••••••••
“And if we have a right to know any Truth whatsoever, we have a right to think freely, or (according to my Definition) to use our Understandings, in endeavouring to find out the Meaning of any Proposition whatsoever, in considering the nature of the Evidence for or against it, and In judging of it according to the seeming Force or weakness of the evidence: because there is no other way to discover the Truth.”
-Anthony Collins, ‘A Discourse of Free Thinking’, 1713, taken from the first page of ‘Thinking to Some Purpose ‘ by L. Susan Stebbing ••••••••••
‘A high degree of probability is often called ‘practical certainty.’ A reasonable man should not refrain upon acting upon a practical certainty as though it were known to be true. In England, for instance, it is customary for a judge, at the trial of a person accused of murder, to instruct the jury that an adverse verdict need not be based upon the belief that the guilt of the prisoner has been ‘ proved ‘, but upon the belief that the guilt has been established ‘ beyond a reasonable doubt .’ To be ‘ beyond reasonable doubt ‘ is to have sufficient evidence to make the proposition in question so much more likely to be true than to be false that we should be prepared to act upon the supposition of its truth. Many of our most important actions have to be performed in accordance with belief of such a kind.’
– L. Susan Stebbing, ‘Logic in Practice’, (1934) pages 98 and 99 ••••••••••
‘Aristotle devides all conclusions into logical and dialectical, in the manner described, and then into eristical. (3) Eristic is the method by which the form of the conclusion is correct, but the premises, the material from which it is drawn, are not true, but only appear to be true. Finally (4) sophistic is the method in which the form of the conclusion is false, although it seems correct. These three last properly belong to the art of Controversial Dialectic, as they have no objective truth in view, but only the appearance of it, and pay no regard to truth itself; that is to say, they aim at victory.’
-Arthur Schopenhauer, The Art of Controversy ••••••••••
New Clear bomb made from PLUTOnium (Pluto is the planet of transformation)
They prob don’t even produce uranium or plutonium batteries. that’s a hoax too
Was the Manhattan Project fake?